Head shots of an odonate exuvia from a Russet-tipped Clubtail dragonfly (Stylurus plagiatus) were taken using two macro lenses: Canon EF100mm f/2.8L Macro lens (smallest aperture = f/32); Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens (smallest aperture = f/16).

No. 1 | Canon EF 100mm Macro lens | f/22

Although there is more depth of field at f/22 than f/11, the more dramatic shot appears to be the one taken at higher magnification using the Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens (shown below). Which photo do you prefer?

No. 2 | Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens | f/11

Tech Tips

The following equipment was used to shoot Photo No. 1: Canon EOS 5D Mark II digital camera, in manual mode; Kenko 20mm macro automatic extension tube; Canon EF100mm f/2.8L Macro lens (set for manual focus, ~1x magnification); and Canon MT-26EX-RT Macro Twin Lite.

Photo No. 2: Canon EOS 5D Mark II digital camera, in manual mode; Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens (manual focus only, set for 2x magnification); and Canon MT-26EX-RT Macro Twin Lite.

Sunpak LED-160 Video Light (with a white translucent plastic filter) was used for both photos.

Related Resource: Stylurus plagiatus exuvia.

Copyright © 2018 Walter Sanford. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Head-to-head”

  1. Mike Powell Says:

    This is a tough call. The second shot seems to have been shot at a lower angle, so it gives more of a direct head-on view, but I really like the way that the first shot is framed and how it includes the wing pads. If forced to choose, I’d probably opt for the first one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: